Traditional Team-Building May Fail And What Works

Understanding The Reasons When Traditional Team-Building Sometimes Falls Short

When “the bosses” have a new idea on how to bring everyone together, why do some cringe and resist EVERY TIME? Team-building exercises are often designed with a one-size-fits-all approach, aiming to boost collaboration, trust, and camaraderie. However, these activities can miss the mark when they fail to account for the different personality directions of team members. In the Authentic Behavior Contrast’s accurate model, the four primary directions—Forward, Reserved, Practical, and Interpersonal—each have unique needs, preferences, and discomforts that can make common exercises ineffective or even counterproductive.

Let’s explore why traditional team-building activities may fail for each direction and how to adjust your approach for better results.

Forward Personality Types: Action-Oriented and Bored by Passive Exercises

Who They Are:
Forward types are action-oriented and include those with a tendency toward Autocratic or Dynamic styles. They thrive on momentum, making quick decisions, and tackling challenges head-on. They love activities that allow them to take charge and make an impact.

Why They Struggle:
Traditional team-building exercises often include passive activities like sitting in a circle and sharing stories or participating in reflective icebreakers. For Forward types, these activities can feel slow, unproductive, and a waste of time. They want something fast-paced that challenges their problem-solving skills.

Examples of Failure:

- Trust Falls: Forward types may find this activity frustratingly slow and overly simplistic, offering no real challenge or sense of progress.
- Two Truths and a Lie: This reflective exercise can feel tedious and pointless to action-driven individuals who want to get moving.
- Long Debrief Sessions: After an activity, lengthy discussions about feelings or reflections may feel like unnecessary delays rather than meaningful team-building.

Better Approach:
Consider activities that are fast-paced, competitive, and goal-oriented. Problem-solving challenges, escape rooms, or physical team sports can engage their drive and keep them actively involved.

Reserved Personality Types: Thoughtful with Dislike for the Spotlight

Who They Are:
Reserved types include Static and Empathic personalities who prefer stability, predictability, and thoughtful interaction. They value consistency and may feel overwhelmed by too much spontaneity or public performance.

Why They Struggle:
Team-building exercises that rely on spontaneous social interaction or require participants to perform in front of the group can be anxiety-inducing for Reserved types. Activities like improv games, icebreakers that demand quick responses, or public speaking tasks often feel uncomfortable and forced.

Examples of Failure:

- Improv Games: Reserved types may feel put on the spot and out of their comfort zone, leading to anxiety rather than bonding.
- Speed Networking: Rapid-fire introductions and surface-level conversations can feel shallow and uncomfortable for those who prefer deeper, one-on-one connections.
- Dance or Music Performances: Activities that require public performance can be overwhelming and may make them withdraw instead of participate.

Better Approach:
Opt for quieter, more reflective activities that allow for deeper conversation without the pressure of public performance. Group discussions in small, intimate settings or collaborative problem-solving tasks that don’t require immediate responses can help Reserved types feel more at ease.

Practical Personality Types: Detail-Oriented with Disdain for Disorganization

Who They Are:
Practical types are often aligned with Autocratic and Static personalities, valuing structure, order, and clear objectives. They prefer activities that are well-organized and purposeful, with tangible outcomes.

Why They Struggle:
Traditional team-building exercises often lack structure, with open-ended activities that may seem disorganized or aimless to Practical types. Creative brainstorming sessions without clear guidelines, or activities that are purely for fun without a defined goal, can feel like a waste of time.

Examples of Failure:

- Open-Ended Brainstorming: Without clear guidelines, Practical types may find these sessions frustrating and unfocused.
- Scavenger Hunts: The chaos and lack of structure in scavenger hunts can be off-putting, as they prefer tasks with clear steps and outcomes.
- Game-Based Icebreakers: Games with no clear objective or reward may seem pointless to those who value tangible, productive activities.

Better Approach:
Choose activities that are structured and have a clear purpose. Task-based challenges, problem-solving activities with specific goals, or even workshops with actionable takeaways can keep Practical types engaged and satisfied.

Interpersonal Personality Types: People-Focused but Dislike Isolation

Who They Are:
Interpersonal types are those with a leaning towards Empathic and Dynamic styles. They thrive in social settings, enjoy building connections, and prefer collaborative environments.

Why They Struggle:
Traditional team-building exercises that involve solitary tasks or minimal interaction can be unappealing for Interpersonal types. Activities like silent retreats, individual challenges, or anything that limits social engagement can feel isolating and demotivating.

Examples of Failure:

- Silent Reflection Exercises: These activities can leave Interpersonal types feeling disconnected, as they thrive on communication and interaction.
- Solo Problem-Solving Tasks: When asked to solve problems alone, they may feel isolated and miss the opportunity to collaborate.
- Quiet Mindfulness Sessions: Long periods of silence or minimal interaction can be draining rather than energizing for socially inclined individuals.

Better Approach:
Opt for highly interactive activities that emphasize collaboration and connection. Group challenges, networking exercises, and activities that require teams to work together towards a common goal will keep Interpersonal types engaged and energized.

Rethinking Team Building for All Directions

Understanding the diverse needs of Forward, Reserved, Practical, and Interpersonal directions can transform your team-building strategy. Instead of relying on generic exercises, tailor activities to accommodate different preferences, allowing each personality direction to shine.

By adjusting your approach, you’ll create a more inclusive environment that not only respects individual tendencies but also boosts engagement and team cohesion. Envision your next team-building session that’s highly engaging to all and makes you feel great as a leader!

Also, you may really enjoy these related articles:

- - - How Your Personality Type Shapes Your Teamwork (ABContrast) Link
      This post explores how different personality types affect teamwork dynamics, which ties directly into why traditional team-building exercises might not resonate with everyone.
    - How Your Personality Type Shapes Leadership Link
      This article discusses how various personality directions impact leadership styles, providing context for why certain team-building activities might fail to engage specific types.
    - Why People Skills Matter in Project Management Link
      This post examines the importance of understanding personality differences in managing teams effectively, which is relevant to selecting appropriate team-building activities.
    - Effectively Selling to Different Client Types Link
      This post covers the importance of adjusting strategies based on personality types, mirroring the adjustments needed in team-building exercises to engage different directions.

START FOR FREE (a fun, 2-minute free personality test with instant results)

PREMIUM CONTENT (pathways for individuals, counselors and team leads)

LEARN EVEN MORE (our WHY US page)